Abstract
The review of the literature revealed no convincing evidence that PBL improves knowledge base and clinical performance, at least not of the magnitude that would be expected given the resources required for a PBL curriculum. The results were considered in light of the educational theory that underlies PBL and its basic research. The author concludes that the ties between educational theory and research (both basic and applied) are loose at best.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The psychological basis of problem-based learning
Several potential advantages for students' learning are claimed for problem-based learning (PBL). Students in PBL curricula may be more highly motivated; they may be better prob...
Problem-based learning
The effects of problem-based learning (PBL) were examined by conducting a meta-analysis-type review of the English-language international literature from 1972 to 1992. Compared ...
Problem‐based learning: why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills
Objectives A recent review of problem‐based learning’s effect on knowledge and clinical skills updated findings reported in 1993. The author argues that effect sizes (ES) seen w...
Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research
The purpose of this review is to synthesize all available evaluative research from 1970 through 1992 that compares problem-based learning (PBL) with more traditional methods of ...
Effectiveness of problem‐based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts
In a recent review article, Colliver concluded that there was no convincing evidence that problem‐based learning was more effective than conventional methods. He then went on to...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2000
- Type
- review
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-266
- Citations
- 907
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1097/00001888-200003000-00017