Abstract
This study compared the effectiveness of collaborative group composition and instructional method on reasoning gains and achievement in college biology. Based on initial student reasoning ability (i.e., low, medium, or high), students were assigned to either homogeneous or heterogeneous collaborative groups within either inquiry or didactic instruction. Achievement and reasoning gains were assessed at the end of the semester. Inquiry instruction, as a whole, led to significantly greater gains in reasoning ability and achievement. Inquiry instruction also led to greater confidence and more positive attitudes toward collaboration. Low-reasoning students made significantly greater reasoning gains within inquiry instruction when grouped with other low reasoners than when grouped with either medium or high reasoners. Results are consistent with equilibration theory, supporting the idea that students benefit from the opportunity for self-regulation without the guidance or direction of a more capable peer.
Keywords
Mathematics educationComposition (language)HomogeneousAcademic achievementGroup (periodic table)PsychologyProportional reasoningComputer scienceMathematicsChemistry
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis.
Children showing low arithmetic achievement received either modeling of division operations or didactic instruction, followed by a practice period. During practice, half of the ...
A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers.
Second-grade, low-achieving students experienced a year of either transactional strategies instruction or highly regarded, more conventional second-grade reading instruction. By...
Collaborative Learning vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students' Reported Learning Gains*
Abstract This study examined the extent to which undergraduate engineering courses taught using active and collaborative learning methods differ from traditional lecture and dis...
Cooperative Learning and Literacy: A Meta-Analytic Review
Abstract We conducted a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of cooperative and collaborative learning to support enhanced literacy outcomes. Interventions considered were provide...
Effects of effort attributional feedback on children's perceived self-efficacy and achievement.
This experiment tested the hypothesis that effort attributional feedback concerning past accomplishments promotes percepts of self-efficacy and mathematical achievement. Childre...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2011
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-73
- Citations
- 143
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
143
OpenAlex
Cite This
Jamie L. Jensen,
Anton E. Lawson
(2011).
Effects of Collaborative Group Composition and Inquiry Instruction on Reasoning Gains and Achievement in Undergraduate Biology.
CBE—Life Sciences Education
, 10
(1)
, 64-73.
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-07-0089
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1187/cbe.10-07-0089