Abstract

The study finds that framing, i.e., priming different decision criteria, influences evaluation outcomes for both expert and novice consumers when the alternatives are noncomparable and influences evaluation outcomes for novices when the alternatives are comparable. The ready availability of a decision criterion, as opposed to the lack of one, also alters consumers' cognitive responses for noncomparable sets to make these responses appear more like cognitive responses typical of comparable sets. One fundamental distinction between sets of noncomparable and comparable alternatives may be the ready availability of decision criteria versus the need to construct them, rather than any inherent differences in category types.

Keywords

Framing (construction)Framing effectCognitionPsychologyPriming (agriculture)Social psychologyNeed for cognitionConstruct (python library)Cognitive psychologyMarketingComputer scienceBusinessPersuasionEngineering

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
141-141
Citations
525
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

525
OpenAlex

Cite This

James R. Bettman, Mita Sujan (1987). Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice Consumers. Journal of Consumer Research , 14 (2) , 141-141. https://doi.org/10.1086/209102

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/209102