Efficient Estimation with Panel Data When Instruments Are Predetermined: An Empirical Comparison of Moment-Condition Estimators

1997 Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 84 citations

Abstract

Abstract I examine the empirical performance of instrumental variables estimators with predetermined instruments in an application to life-cycle labor supply under uncertainty. The estimators studied are two-stage least squares, generalized method-of-moments (GMM), forward filter, independently weighted GMM, and split-sample instrumental variables. I compare the bias/efficiency trade-off for the estimators using bootstrap algorithms suggested by Freedman and by Brown and Newey. Results indicate that the downward bias in GMM is quite severe as the number of moment conditions expands, outweighing the gains in efficiency. The forward-filter estimator, however, has lower bias and is more efficient than two-stage least squares. KEY WORDS: BootstrapLife-cycle labor supplyOveridentifying restrictionsSplit samples

Keywords

EstimatorPanel dataEstimationEconometricsMoment (physics)StatisticsMathematicsEconomics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1997
Type
article
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
419-419
Citations
84
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

84
OpenAlex

Cite This

James P. Ziliak (1997). Efficient Estimation with Panel Data When Instruments Are Predetermined: An Empirical Comparison of Moment-Condition Estimators. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics , 15 (4) , 419-419. https://doi.org/10.2307/1392488

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/1392488