Abstract

The functioning of the Endangered Species Act has been less effective than expected because remedial action is not triggered until populations are in serious trouble and because of the inadequacies of a species—by—species approach. These problems have stimulated interest in expanding the Act to protect endangered habitats, communities, and ecosystems. Such a development requires the existence of a generally agreed—upon classification system for these larger ecological units. No such classification system exists, and developing one will be difficult and politically contentious.

Keywords

Endangered speciesHabitatEcologyRemedial actionAction (physics)EcosystemGeographyEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningBiologyEnvironmental science

Related Publications

ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION

1. Fishes have definite habitat preferences which cause them to be definitely arranged in streams which have a graded series of conditions from mouth to source. 2. Beginning at ...

1911 Biological Bulletin 137 citations

Publication Info

Year
1993
Type
article
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
206-208
Citations
98
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

98
OpenAlex

Cite This

Gordon H. Orians (1993). Endangered at What Level?. Ecological Applications , 3 (2) , 206-208. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941821

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/1941821