Abstract

Heavy-ion beams of fixed initial energy ($\frac{{E}^{0}}{m}\ensuremath{\approx}10$ Mev/amu) are passed through aluminum absorbers of known thickness, and the emergent ions are analyzed by means of a magnetic spectrograph to determine their charge and energy distributions. Accurate measurements of the mean emergent ion energy as a function of absorber thickness are reported for beams of ${\mathrm{He}}^{4}$, ${\mathrm{B}}^{10}$, ${\mathrm{B}}^{11}$, ${\mathrm{C}}^{12}$, ${\mathrm{N}}^{14}$, ${\mathrm{O}}^{16}$, ${\mathrm{F}}^{19}$, and ${\mathrm{Ne}}^{20}$ ions with emergent energies in the range $10>\frac{E}{m}>1$ Mev/amu. The results can be interpreted as measurements of the range-energy relation for heavy ions. While the absolute accuracy of the range measurements is approximately \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1 mg/${\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$, the range difference $R({E}^{0})\ensuremath{-}R(E)$ is measured (as a function of $E$) with a typical accuracy of \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.1 mg/${\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$. In the analysis the shape of the heavy-ion range-energy curve is compared with the accurately known shape of the proton range-energy curve (using the conversion factor $\ensuremath{\Delta}R=m{{Z}_{p}}^{2}{({m}_{p}{Z}^{2})}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\ensuremath{\Delta}{R}_{p}$) and the differences in shape are attributed to deviations of the effective charge of the ion from its nuclear charge. No detectable difference is found between the shape of the range-energy curve for ${\mathrm{He}}^{4}$ ions and for protons. For heavier ions, deviations in the curve shape do occur. A simple empirical formula is found for the effective charge of an ion as a function of its velocity which is consistent with the deviations of the observed range-energy curves and presumably can be used to predict the range-energy curves for ions not investigated experimentally. By an independent analysis of the spectrograph data the equilibrium distribution of charge states in the ${\mathrm{O}}^{16}$ beam is determined as a function of emergent beam energy. The effective charge implied by the charge state distribution is found to be consistent with the effective charge as given by the empirical formula.

Keywords

IonAtomic physicsPhysicsEnergy (signal processing)Range (aeronautics)Charge (physics)Effective nuclear chargeProtonAluminiumNuclear physicsMaterials science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Structure of the Proton

The structure and size of the proton have been studied by means of high-energy electron scattering. The elastic scattering of electrons from protons in polyethylene has been inv...

1956 Physical Review 142 citations

Publication Info

Year
1960
Type
article
Volume
120
Issue
5
Pages
1744-1757
Citations
238
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

238
OpenAlex

Cite This

L. C. Northcliffe (1960). Energy Loss and Effective Charge of Heavy Ions in Aluminum. Physical Review , 120 (5) , 1744-1757. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.120.1744

Identifiers

DOI
10.1103/physrev.120.1744