Abstract
Dementia is one of the world's major public health challenges. The lifetime risk of dementia is the proportion of individuals who ever develop dementia during their lifetime. Despite its importance to epidemiologists and policy-makers, this measure does not seem to have been estimated in the Canadian population. Data from a birth cohort study of dementia are not available. Instead, we must rely on data from the Canadian Study of Heath and Aging, a large cross-sectional study of dementia with follow-up for survival. These data present challenges because they include substantial loss to follow-up and are not representatively drawn from the target population because of structural sampling biases. A first bias is imparted by the cross-sectional sampling scheme, while a second bias is a result of stratified sampling. Estimation of the lifetime risk and related quantities in the presence of these biases has not been previously addressed in the literature. We develop and study nonparametric estimators of the lifetime risk, the remaining lifetime risk and cumulative risk at specific ages, accounting for these complexities. In particular, we reveal the fact that estimation of the lifetime risk is invariant to stratification by current age at sampling. We present simulation results validating our methodology, and provide novel facts about the epidemiology of dementia in Canada using data from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Prevalence and 10‐Year Outcomes of Frailty in Older Adults in Relation to Deficit Accumulation
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence and 10‐year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: The Nation...
Age Differences in Self-Assessments of Health: Age Changes, Cohort Differences, or Survivorship?
Do older people tend to exaggerate their health problems? Or do they downplay them? Do such tendencies change as people age? Are they a function of cohort membership? Or are dif...
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cross-sectional studies are observational studies that analyze data from a population at a single point in time. They are often used to measure the prevalence of health outcomes...
Lifetime Risk of Atrial Fibrillation by Race and Socioeconomic Status
Background: Limited information exists on the lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) in African Americans and by socioeconomic status. Methods: We studied 15 343 participants...
Prevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study
The China Mental Health Survey was set up in 2012 to do a nationally representative survey with consistent methodology to investigate the prevalence of mental disorders and serv...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2013
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 505
- Pages
- 24-35
- Citations
- 41
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.2013.859076