Abstract

Logistic regression yields an adjusted odds ratio that approximates the adjusted relative risk when disease incidence is rare (<10%), while adjusting for potential confounders. For more common outcomes, the odds ratio always overstates the relative risk, sometimes dramatically. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the incorrect application of a proposed method to estimate an adjusted relative risk from an adjusted odds ratio, which has quickly gained popularity in medical and public health research, and to describe alternative statistical methods for estimating an adjusted relative risk when the outcome is common. Hypothetical data are used to illustrate statistical methods with readily accessible computer software.

Keywords

Relative riskOdds ratioConfoundingMedicineLogistic regressionOddsDiagnostic odds ratioStatisticsIncidence (geometry)Cohort studyConfidence intervalDemographyMathematicsInternal medicine

MeSH Terms

Clinical Trials as TopicCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesData InterpretationStatisticalHealth Services ResearchHumansOdds RatioOutcome AssessmentHealth CarePoisson DistributionRisk

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2003
Type
article
Volume
157
Issue
10
Pages
940-943
Citations
2054
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2054
OpenAlex
65
Influential
1665
CrossRef

Cite This

Louise‐Anne McNutt (2003). Estimating the Relative Risk in Cohort Studies and Clinical Trials of Common Outcomes. American Journal of Epidemiology , 157 (10) , 940-943. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg074

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/aje/kwg074
PMID
12746247

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%