Abstract

gets reintroduced to me in a recurrent episode at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association. I'm waiting for the elevator. The doors open. Oh, Hi Hal! Hi. I walk in. THE QUESTION is asked: Hey, Hal, what IS ethnomethodology? The elevator doors close. We're on our way to the ninth floor. I'm only able to say, Ethnomethodology is working out some very preposterous The elevator doors open. On the way to my room it occurs to me that I should have said that ethnomethodology is respecifying Durkheim's lived immortal, ordinary society, evidently, doing so by working out a schedule of preposterous problems. The problems have their sources in the worldwide social science movement. They are motivated by that movement's ubiquitous commitments to the policies and methods of formal analysis and general representational theorizing and by its unquestionable achievements. Formal Analytic (FA) technology and its results are understood worldwide. Almost

Keywords

EthnomethodologyDoorsSociologyElevatorPorchEpistemologySocial scienceComputer scienceHistoryPhilosophyEngineering

Related Publications

ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SOCIAL REALITY

This short treatise looks at how we construct a social reality from our sense impressions; at how, for example, we construct a five-pound note with all that implies in terms of ...

2018 University of Iowa Press eBooks 4820 citations

Publication Info

Year
1996
Type
article
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
5-5
Citations
680
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

680
OpenAlex

Cite This

Harold Garfinkel (1996). Ethnomethodology's Program. Social Psychology Quarterly , 59 (1) , 5-5. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787116

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2787116