Abstract

We summarize the potential impact that the European Union's new General Data Protection Regulation will have on the routine use of machine‐learning algorithms. Slated to take effect as law across the European Union in 2018, it will place restrictions on automated individual decision making (that is, algorithms that make decisions based on user‐level predictors) that “significantly affect” users. When put into practice, the law may also effectively create a right to explanation, whereby a user can ask for an explanation of an algorithmic decision that significantly affects them. We argue that while this law may pose large challenges for industry, it highlights opportunities for computer scientists to take the lead in designing algorithms and evaluation frameworks that avoid discrimination and enable explanation.

Keywords

European unionPolitical scienceLaw and economicsComputer scienceManagement scienceInternational tradeBusinessSociologyEconomics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

There has been much discussion of the "right to explanation" in the EU General Data Protection Regulation, and its existence, merits, and disadvantages. Implementing a right to ...

Surrey Open Research repository (Univ... 1512 citations

Judgment Misguided

Abstract People often follow intuitive principles of decision making, ranging from group loyalty to the belief that nature is benign. But instead of using these principles as ru...

1998 140 citations

Do the Right Thing

The authors argue that a new theoretical foundation for artificial intelligence can be constructed in which rationality is a property of "programs" within a finite architecture,...

1991 The MIT Press eBooks 315 citations

Publication Info

Year
2017
Type
article
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
50-57
Citations
1919
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1919
OpenAlex
51
Influential
1054
CrossRef

Cite This

Bryce Goodman, Seth Flaxman (2017). European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision Making and a “Right to Explanation”. AI Magazine , 38 (3) , 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741

Identifiers

DOI
10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741
arXiv
1606.08813

Data Quality

Data completeness: 84%