Abstract
Qualitative research is not a unified field. Most manuscript and grant reviewers are not qualitative experts and are likely to embrace a generic set of criteria rather than those relevant to the particular qualitative approach proposed or reported. Reviewers and researchers need to be aware of this tendency and educate health care researchers about the criteria appropriate for evaluating qualitative research from within the theoretical and methodological framework from which it emerges.
Keywords
MeSH Terms
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Strengthening Qualitative Studies and Reports
This article examines six criteria for conducting qualitative research and evaluating qualitative research reports in social work: (1) identification of the chosen philosophy/ep...
Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research
This is the first in a series of three articles In the past decade, qualitative methods have become more commonplace in areas such as health services research and health techn...
Scientific Journals and Their Authors’ Financial Interests: A Pilot Study
<b>Background:</b> The credibility of modern science is grounded on the perception of the objectivity of its scientists, but that credibility can be undermined by fi...
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests
To review empirical studies that assess saturation in qualitative research in order to identify sample sizes for saturation, strategies used to assess saturation, and guidance w...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2008
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 331-339
- Citations
- 821
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1370/afm.818
- PMID
- 18626033
- PMCID
- PMC2478498