Abstract

This study aimed to determine the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in decision-making, research, policy-making, and the implementation of an adaptation plan, with a comprehensive view of their positions, influence, and power. This descriptive-analytical research was conducted using a social network analysis approach. The opinions of 25 university professors, experts, and executives were gathered through a questionnaire utilizing a Likert scale, selected via purposive and snowball sampling. Data analysis and graph design were performed using Microsoft Excel and Gephi software (version 0.9.2). Stakeholder interaction patterns were identified using the Force Atlas 2 algorithm and graph theory concepts. The network comprised 37 nodes, 3 clusters, and 63 edges. It closely resembled a complete graph, with a density of 0.971. Within the network of stakeholders, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change emerged as the most active participant, exhibiting relatively strong external interactions with other stakeholders. In contrast, the Department of Environmental Protection and the Ministry of Health and Medical Education showed relatively weak and very weak external interactions, respectively. Given the conflicting interests between industrial sectors and the health sector, it appears that the Ministry of Health and Medical Education should enhance its power and influence over other stakeholders. Additionally, involving representatives from the health sector in policy reviews and stakeholder consultations may help bridge the gap between health and other sectors regarding climate change issues. Not applicable. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40201-025-00947-z.

Keywords

CONTESTGame theoryVon Neumann architectureTRACE (psycholinguistics)Mathematical economicsEvolutionarily stable strategyMinimaxEvolutionary game theoryRange (aeronautics)AdversaryComputer scienceEpistemologyMathematicsPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1988
Type
article
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
202-215
Citations
7989
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

7989
OpenAlex
617
Influential
39
CrossRef

Cite This

John Maynard Smith (1988). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Did Darwin Get It Right? , 64 (1) , 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7862-4_22

Identifiers

DOI
10.1007/978-1-4684-7862-4_22
PMID
40672795
PMCID
PMC12259509

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%