Abstract

A static explanation argues that something is so because something else is so. For example, an explanation of a state of affairs in terms of an equilibrium is static. A dynamic explanation, on the other hand, argues the something is so because it has become so. The physicist, for example, views the velocity of a falling stone as a result of force having acted (not merely now acting) on the stone. In this article, the author points out the excessive reliance of many social sciences upon static explanations of social arrangements (equilibria, adjustment, etc.) and the comparative neglect of dynamic (historical) analysis. He also develops heuristic criteria for judging the explanatory value of various social variables in dynamic analysis.

Keywords

NeglectValue (mathematics)HeuristicPositive economicsEpistemologyDynamics (music)SociologyEconomicsMathematical economicsMathematicsPsychologyPhilosophy

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2007
Type
article
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
136-145
Citations
12
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

12
OpenAlex

Cite This

John C. Harsanyi (2007). Explanation and comparative dynamics in social science. Systems Research and Behavioral Science , 5 (2) , 136-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830050203

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/bs.3830050203