Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm

1996 Strategic Management Journal 7,687 citations

Abstract

Abstract The ability to transfer best practices internally is critical to a firm's ability to build competitive advantage through the appropriation of rents from scarce internal knowledge. Just as a firm's distinctive competencies might be difficult for other firms to imitate, its best practices could be difficult to imitate internally. Yet, little systematic attention has been paid to such internal stickiness. The author analyzes internal stickiness of knowledge transfer and tests the resulting model using canonical correlation analysis of a data set consisting of 271 observations of 122 best‐practice transfers in eight companies. Contrary to conventional wisdom that blames primarily motivational factors, the study findings show the major barriers to internal knowledge transfer to be knowledge‐related factors such as the recipient's lack of absorptive capacity, causal ambiguity, and an arduous relationship between the source and the recipient.

Keywords

AppropriationAmbiguityEconomic rentKnowledge transferBusinessAbsorptive capacityIndustrial organizationSet (abstract data type)MarketingKnowledge managementEconomicsMicroeconomicsComputer scienceEpistemology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Nutritional Rickets in San Diego

Despite the ability of infants to synthesize vitamin D through exposure to sunlight, nutritional rickets occasionally develops in infants even in areas with perennially sunny cl...

1987 Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent... 38 citations

Publication Info

Year
1996
Type
article
Volume
17
Issue
S2
Pages
27-43
Citations
7687
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

7687
OpenAlex

Cite This

Gabriel Szulanski (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal , 17 (S2) , 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/smj.4250171105