Abstract
Abstract We present results of an interlaboratory survey of cholesterol assays in which methodology, standardization technique, type of standard, reagent source, and control sera used are considered. Each of these factors is evaluated, on both clear and icteric sera, with respect to accuracy, interlaboratory precision, and associated random error. We find that most participants use direct techniques, that these laboratories do not use correction procedures where these are needed, and that not all extractants effectively prevent bilirubin interference. Our data illustrate that precision on clear sera is best by direct procedures, but not in the presence of bilirubin. Participants uniformly exhibit better intralaboratory precision than interlaboratory agreement, regardless of the variable being studied. It is appropriate to consider the interactions of variables if a technique is to be properly evaluated.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation
Commonly used evaluation measures including Recall, Precision, F-Measure and Rand Accuracy are biased and should not be used without clear understanding of the biases, and corre...
Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods
Exploring the possible reasons for heterogeneity between studies is an important aspect of conducting a meta-analysis. This paper compares a number of methods which can be used ...
Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions
Information theoretic approaches and model averaging are increasing in popularity, but this approach can be difficult to apply to the realistic, complex models that typify many ...
PROTEIN MEASUREMENT WITH THE FOLIN PHENOL REAGENT
Since 1922 when Wu proposed the use of the Folin phenol reagent for the measurement of proteins (l), a number of modified analytical procedures ut.ilizing this reagent have been...
Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference
In epidemiological research, the causal effect of a modifiable phenotype or exposure on a disease is often of public health interest. Randomized controlled trials to investigate...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1972
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 901-908
- Citations
- 22
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1093/clinchem/18.9.901