Abstract

Gene families are growing rapidly, but standard methods for inferring phylogenies do not scale to alignments with over 10,000 sequences. We present FastTree, a method for constructing large phylogenies and for estimating their reliability. Instead of storing a distance matrix, FastTree stores sequence profiles of internal nodes in the tree. FastTree uses these profiles to implement Neighbor-Joining and uses heuristics to quickly identify candidate joins. FastTree then uses nearest neighbor interchanges to reduce the length of the tree. For an alignment with N sequences, L sites, and a different characters, a distance matrix requires O(N(2)) space and O(N(2)L) time, but FastTree requires just O(NLa + N ) memory and O(N log (N)La) time. To estimate the tree's reliability, FastTree uses local bootstrapping, which gives another 100-fold speedup over a distance matrix. For example, FastTree computed a tree and support values for 158,022 distinct 16S ribosomal RNAs in 17 h and 2.4 GB of memory. Just computing pairwise Jukes-Cantor distances and storing them, without inferring a tree or bootstrapping, would require 17 h and 50 GB of memory. In simulations, FastTree was slightly more accurate than Neighbor-Joining, BIONJ, or FastME; on genuine alignments, FastTree's topologies had higher likelihoods. FastTree is available at http://microbesonline.org/fasttree.

Keywords

Distance matrixBootstrapping (finance)Tree (set theory)SpeedupDistance matrices in phylogenyJoinsMatrix (chemical analysis)Pairwise comparisonBiologyComputer sciencePhylogenetic treeHeuristicsAlgorithmCombinatoricsArtificial intelligenceBioinformaticsMathematicsGeneticsParallel computingGene

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2009
Type
article
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1641-1650
Citations
5466
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

5466
OpenAlex

Cite This

Morgan N. Price, Paramvir Dehal, Adam P. Arkin (2009). FastTree: Computing Large Minimum Evolution Trees with Profiles instead of a Distance Matrix. Molecular Biology and Evolution , 26 (7) , 1641-1650. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp077

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/molbev/msp077