Abstract

We examine the behavior of measured variances from the options market and the underlying stock market. Under the joint hypotheses that markets are informationally efficient and that option prices are explained by a particular asset pricing model, forecasts from time-series models of the stock return process should not have predictive content given the market forecast as embodied in option prices. Both in-sample and out-of-sample tests suggest that this hypothesis can be rejected. Using simulations, we show that biases inherent in the procedure we use to imply variances cannot explain this result. Thus, we provide evidence inconsistent with the orthogonality restrictions of option pricing models that assume that variance risk is unpriced. These results also have implications for optimum variance forecast rules.

Keywords

EconometricsEconomicsVariance (accounting)Stock (firearms)Capital asset pricing modelStock marketSample (material)OrthogonalityFinancial economicsMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1993
Type
article
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
293-326
Citations
567
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

567
OpenAlex
21
Influential
387
CrossRef

Cite This

Christopher G. Lamoureux, William D. Lastrapes (1993). Forecasting Stock-Return Variance: Toward an Understanding of Stochastic Implied Volatilities. Review of Financial Studies , 6 (2) , 293-326. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/6.2.293

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/rfs/6.2.293

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%