Abstract

This article tests one key assumption of Bourdieu's theory of culture fields: that actors are positioned in a "topography" of social relations according to their endowments of economic, social, and cultural capital. Blockmodeling procedures are used to analyze data on German writers and to indentify a social structure in which positions vary according to the types and amounts of capital accumulated. A strong split between elite and marginal writers dominates the social structure, and even the fundamental distinction between high and low culture is embedded in this bipartition. Significant differences in both cultural and social capital distinguish elite from nonelite positions; within this bipartition, pronounced differences in cultural capital separate high and low culture. Relative to cultural and social capital, economic capital plays a lesser role in understanding the social structure of cultural fields.

Keywords

Cultural capitalSocial capitalEliteSociologySocial reproductionGermanHabitusSocial mobilityCapital (architecture)Positive economicsSocial statusCultural economicsIndividual capitalEconomic capitalEconomic geographyEconomicsSocial scienceNeoclassical economicsPolitical scienceGeographyLinguisticsLawPhilosophy

Related Publications

The Social Control of Impersonal Trust

How do societies control trust relationships that are not embedded in structures of personal relations? This paper discusses the guardians of impersonal trust and discovers that...

1987 American Journal of Sociology 1672 citations

Publication Info

Year
1995
Type
article
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
859-903
Citations
476
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

476
OpenAlex

Cite This

Helmut K. Anheier, Jürgen Gerhards, Frank P. Romo (1995). Forms of Capital and Social Structure in Cultural Fields: Examining Bourdieu's Social Topography. American Journal of Sociology , 100 (4) , 859-903. https://doi.org/10.1086/230603

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/230603