Abstract
Abstract Neutrality tests based on the frequency spectrum (e.g., Tajima's D or Fu and Li's F) are commonly used by population geneticists as routine tests to assess the goodness-of-fit of the standard neutral model on their data sets. Here, I show that these neutrality tests are specific instances of a general model that encompasses them all. I illustrate how this general framework can be taken advantage of to devise new more powerful tests that better detect deviations from the standard model. Finally, I exemplify the usefulness of the framework on SNP data by showing how it supports the selection hypothesis in the lactase human gene by overcoming the ascertainment bias. The framework presented here paves the way for constructing novel tests optimized for specific violations of the standard model that ultimately will help to unravel scenarios of evolution.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Goodness-of-Fit Testing for Latent Class Models
Latent class models with sparse contingency tables can present problems for model comparison and selection, because under these conditions the distributions of goodness-of-fit i...
MISFITS: Evaluating the Goodness of Fit between a Phylogenetic Model and an Alignment
As models of sequence evolution become more and more complicated, many criteria for model selection have been proposed, and tools are available to select the best model for an a...
Selecting the Best-Fit Model of Nucleotide Substitution
Despite the relevant role of models of nucleotide substitution in phylogenetics, choosing among different models remains a problem. Several statistical methods for selecting the...
Performance-Based Selection of Likelihood Models for Phylogeny Estimation
Phylogenetic estimation has largely come to rely on explicitly model-based methods. This approach requires that a model be chosen and that that choice be justified. To date, jus...
Finite-Mixture Structural Equation Models for Response-Based Segmentation and Unobserved Heterogeneity
Two endemic problems face researchers in the social sciences (e.g., Marketing, Economics, Psychology, and Finance): unobserved heterogeneity and measurement error in data. Struc...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2009
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 249-258
- Citations
- 152
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.109.104042