Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group

2007 Journal of Clinical Oncology 588 citations

Abstract

Purpose This phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (Gem) plus capecitabine (GemCap) versus single-agent Gem in advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive GemCap (oral capecitabine 650 mg/m 2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 plus Gem 1,000 mg/m 2 by 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or Gem (1,000 mg/m 2 by 30-minute infusion weekly for 7 weeks, followed by a 1-week break, and then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks). Patients were stratified according to center, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), presence of pain, and disease extent. Results A total of 319 patients were enrolled between June 2001 and June 2004. Median overall survival (OS) time, the primary end point, was 8.4 and 7.2 months in the GemCap and Gem arms, respectively (P = .234). Post hoc analysis in patients with good KPS (score of 90 to 100) showed a significant prolongation of median OS time in the GemCap arm compared with the Gem arm (10.1 v 7.4 months, respectively; P = .014). The overall frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar in each arm. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse event in both arms. Conclusion GemCap failed to improve OS at a statistically significant level compared with standard Gem treatment. The safety of GemCap and Gem was similar. In the subgroup of patients with good performance status, median OS was improved significantly. GemCap is a practical regimen that may be considered as an alternative to single-agent Gem for the treatment of advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with a good performance status.

Keywords

MedicineCapecitabineGemcitabineNeutropeniaAdverse effectClinical endpointInternal medicineRegimenPerformance statusPancreatic cancerCancerPhases of clinical researchClinical trialSurgeryGastroenterologyChemotherapyColorectal cancer

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000–01 FFCD/SFRO study

The role of chemoradiation with systemic chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is uncertain. One hundred and nineteen patien...

2008 Annals of Oncology 681 citations

Phase III, Randomized Study of Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin Versus Gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) Compared With Gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in Patients With Pancreatic Carcinoma E6201: A Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

Purpose Single-agent gemcitabine (GEM) is standard treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Fixed-dose rate (FDR) GEM and GEM plus oxaliplatin have shown promise in early clin...

2009 Journal of Clinical Oncology 423 citations

Publication Info

Year
2007
Type
article
Volume
25
Issue
16
Pages
2212-2217
Citations
588
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

588
OpenAlex

Cite This

Richard Herrmann, G. Bodoky, Thomas Ruhstaller et al. (2007). Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology , 25 (16) , 2212-2217. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.09.0886

Identifiers

DOI
10.1200/jco.2006.09.0886