Abstract

Affect intensity (AI) may reconcile 2 seemingly paradoxical findings: Women report more negative affect than men but equal happiness as men. AI describes people's varying response intensity to identical emotional stimuli. A college sample of 66 women and 34 men was assessed on both positive and negative affect using 4 measurement methods: self-report, peer report, daily report, and memory performance. A principal-components analysis revealed an affect balance component and an AI component. Multimeasure affect balance and AI scores were created, and t tests were computed that showed women to be as happy as and more intense than men. Gender accounted for less than 1% of the variance in happiness but over 13% in AI. Thus, depression findings of more negative affect in women do not conflict with well-being findings of equal happiness across gender. Generally, women's more intense positive emotions balance their higher negative affect.

Keywords

Affect (linguistics)PsychologyHappinessDevelopmental psychologyBalance (ability)Social psychology

Related Publications

Most People Are Happy

Myers and Diener (1995) asked “Who is happy?” but examined the question of who is more and who is less happy In fact, most people report a positive level of subjective well-bein...

1996 Psychological Science 1169 citations

Publication Info

Year
1991
Type
article
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
427-434
Citations
683
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

683
OpenAlex

Cite This

Frank Fujita, Ed Diener, Ed Sandvik (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 61 (3) , 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.3.427

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037//0022-3514.61.3.427