Global change in agrifood grades and standards: agribusiness strategic responses in developing countries

1999 The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 421 citations

Abstract

The role of G&S has shifted from a technical instrument to reduce transaction costs in homogeneous commodity markets to a strategic instrument of competition in differentiated product markets. The nature of G&S has shifted from performance (realized characteristics of the product) to process standards. In developing countries, these changes have tended to exclude small firms and farms from participating in market growth, because of the implied investments. The three strategic responses to G&S change by agribusiness firms and farms include: (1) by large firms and multinationals, to create private G&S and private certification, labeling, and branding systems; (2) by medium-large domestic firms, to lobby governments to adopt public G&S similar to those in export markets in developed regions; (3) by small firms and farms, to ally with public and nonprofit sectors to form G&S and certification systems to access export markets and to bring institutional change to nontradable product markets. Governments should build the capacity of the poor to invest to 'make the grade' implied by the new G&S.

Keywords

AgribusinessBusinessDeveloping countryEconomicsIndustrial organizationInternational tradeAgricultureEconomic growth

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1999
Type
article
Volume
2
Issue
3-4
Pages
421-435
Citations
421
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

421
OpenAlex

Cite This

Thomas Reardon (1999). Global change in agrifood grades and standards: agribusiness strategic responses in developing countries. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review , 2 (3-4) , 421-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7508(01)00035-0

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/s1096-7508(01)00035-0