Abstract

All geophysical data bases need some form of quality assurance. Otherwise, erroneous data points may produce faulty analyses. However, simplistic quality control procedures have been known to contribute to erroneous conclusions by removing valid data points that were more extreme than the data set compilers expected. In producing version 2 of the global historical climatology network's (GHCN's) temperature data sets, a variety of quality control tests were evaluated and a specialized suite of procedures was developed. Quality control traditionally relies primarily on checks for outliers from both a time series and spatial perspective, the latter accomplished by comparisons with neighbouring stations. This traditional approach was used, and it was determined that there are many data problems that require additional tests to detect. In this paper a suite of quality control tests are justified and documented and applied to this global temperature data base, emphasizing the logic and limitations of each test. © 1998 Royal Meteorological Society

Keywords

Computer scienceSuiteOutlierQuality assuranceQuality (philosophy)Data setData qualityClimatologySet (abstract data type)Data miningGeographyArtificial intelligenceGeologyEngineering

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1998
Type
article
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
1169-1179
Citations
235
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

235
OpenAlex

Cite This

Thomas C. Peterson, Russell S. Vose, Richard L. Schmoyer et al. (1998). Global historical climatology network (GHCN) quality control of monthly temperature data. International Journal of Climatology , 18 (11) , 1169-1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0088(199809)18:11<1169::aid-joc309>3.0.co;2-u

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/(sici)1097-0088(199809)18:11<1169::aid-joc309>3.0.co;2-u