GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

Keywords

Observational studyQuality (philosophy)Context (archaeology)Confidence intervalQuality of evidencePublication biasMedicineRandomized controlled trialEvidence-based medicineQuality ScoreAlternative medicineOperations managementInternal medicinePathologyEngineering

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

Julie R. Brahmer , Christina Lacchetti , Bryan J. Schneider +26 more

Purpose To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint i...

2018 Journal of Clinical Oncology 3484 citations

An emerging consensus on grading recommendations?

Gordon Guyatt

Clinical practice guidelines have improved in quality over the past 10 years by adhering to a few basic principles, such as conducting thorough systematic reviews of relevant ev...

2006 Evidence-Based Medicine 137 citations

Raising the bar for systematic reviews with Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews ( <scp>AMSTAR</scp> )

Philipp Dahm

The BJUI has a longstanding track record in promoting the dissemination of high-quality unbiased evidence and helping their readership to understand why the principles of eviden...

2017 British Journal of Urology 15 citations

What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?

Gordon Guyatt , Andrew D Oxman , Regina Kunz +3 more

Guideline developers use a bewildering variety of systems to rate the quality of the evidence underlying their recommendations. Some are facile, some confused, and others sophis...

2008 BMJ 3112 citations

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update

Börje Ljungberg , Laurence Albigès , Yasmin Abu‐Ghanem +16 more

The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Guideline Panel has prepared evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for the management of RCC. To provide a...

2019 European Urology 1486 citations

Publication Info

Year: 2011
Type: article
Volume: 64
Issue: 4
Pages: 401-406
Citations: 7559
Access: Closed

External Links

View on DOI.org

Social Impact

Altmetric

GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

7559

OpenAlex

Cite This

APA Style

                            
                                
                                    Howard Balshem, 
                                
                                    Mark Helfand, 
                                
                                    Holger J. Schünemann
                                
                                et al.
                            
                            (2011). 
                            GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. 
                            Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
                            , 64
                            (4)
                            , 401-406.
                            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
                        

Identifiers

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015