Abstract

A longitudinal field study examined Pettigrew’s (1998) intergroup contact theory and Gaertner et al.’s (2000) Common Ingroup Identity Model (CIIM). In Pettigrew’s model, the contact-prejudice relation is mediated by changing behavior, ingroup reappraisal, generating affective ties, and learning about the outgroup. Pettigrew’s integration of the three chief models of contact generalization into a time-sequence holds that contact first elicits decategorization, then salient categorization, and finally recategorization. In CIIM, these three levels of categorization—plus a fourth, dual identity—are thought to be mediators in the contact-prejudice relation. Results underline the crucial mediating role of behavior modification in Pettigrew’s model and interpersonal and superordinate levels in CIIM. An attempt to partially integrate the two models is presented.

Keywords

PsychologyPrejudice (legal term)CategorizationIngroups and outgroupsSocial psychologySuperordinate goalsOutgroupContact hypothesisInterpersonal communicationAssociation (psychology)Identity (music)Social identity theoryContact theorySocial groupLinguistics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2003
Type
article
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
55-75
Citations
141
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

141
OpenAlex

Cite This

Anja Eller, Dominic Abrams (2003). ‘Gringos’ in Mexico: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Effects of Language School-Promoted Contact on Intergroup Bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations , 6 (1) , 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001012

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/1368430203006001012