Abstract
Applying the findings of qualitative research to practice is far from straightforward. This difficulty is often overlooked in the literature on the role of qualitative research in evidence-based practice. In this EBN notebook, we argue that current attempts to provide guidance for clinicians do not accurately capture the specific and unique contribution of qualitative approaches. We will clarify the type of clinical questions for which qualitative research may provide appropriate answers and consider what the application of qualitative research findings to practice might mean. This analysis will result in guidance on the application of qualitative research findings to practice. Qualitative research is one of many forms of research that may be useful to practitioners,1–,5 and the integration of qualitative research into practice has been described as one of the major challenges in evidence-based health care.6,7 It is not entirely clear what the challenges are, as there are many and varied claims made about the differences between qualitative and quantitative research. The terms qualitative and quantitative emerged from attempts to establish clear ground between different philosophical positions about the nature of reality (philosophically termed ontology) and how we can come to know it (philosophically termed epistemology) rather than any practical grouping of research designs and types.8,9 There are far fewer differences between qualitative and quantitative research than is often claimed.8,10 Both are processes of systematic inquiry rooted firmly in the tradition of empiricism (ie, knowledge should be based on observation of the world).11 In both qualitative and quantitative research, data provide the basis for reasoning. In quantitative approaches, data take the form of numbers, whereas in qualitative approaches, data usually take the form of text (ie, observation is transformed into text for the purpose of analysis). In qualitative approaches, reasoning is …
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Balancing the evidence: incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews
Abstract Techniques for the systematic review of evidence of effectiveness are now well established. Health‐care professionals argue, however, for a need to recognise evidence o...
Catching Goldfish: Quality in Qualitative Research
This paper reviews the contribution of qualitative methods to health services research (HSR) and discusses some of the issues involved in recognizing quality in such work. The p...
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
Developing a universal quality standard for thematic analysis (TA) is complicated by the existence of numerous iterations of TA that differ paradigmatically, philosophically and...
Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education
Context Formal qualitative synthesis is the process of pooling qualitative and mixed‐method research data, and then drawing conclusions regarding the collective meaning of the r...
Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians
Mendelian randomisation uses genetic variation as a natural experiment to investigate the causal relations between potentially modifiable risk factors and health outcomes in obs...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2006
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-7
- Citations
- 36
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1136/ebn.9.1.4