Abstract
Normative housing deficits are introduced into an analysis of the propensity to move as intervening variables between socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and satisfaction. The findings support the use of residential satisfaction and normative housing deficits as predictors of the propensity to move. The results indicate that the propensity to move is a response to housing satisfaction which, in turn, is a response to discrepancies between achieved and normatively prescribed housing.
Keywords
NormativePropensity score matchingSocioeconomic statusMultilevel modelPsychologyNormative social influencePublic housingSocial psychologyDemographic economicsSociologyEconomicsPolitical scienceDemographyEconomic growthMedicineMathematics
Related Publications
The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization
Organizational commitment has been conceptualized and measured in various ways. The two studies reported here were conducted to test aspects of a three‐component model of commit...
Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health
Earth's natural systems represent a growing threat to human health. And yet, global health has mainly improved as these changes have gathered pace. What is the explanation? As a...
Finite-Mixture Structural Equation Models for Response-Based Segmentation and Unobserved Heterogeneity
Two endemic problems face researchers in the social sciences (e.g., Marketing, Economics, Psychology, and Finance): unobserved heterogeneity and measurement error in data. Struc...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1976
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309-309
- Citations
- 166
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
166
OpenAlex
Cite This
Earl W. Morris,
Sue R. Crull,
Mary Winter
(1976).
Housing Norms, Housing Satisfaction and the Propensity to Move.
Journal of Marriage and the Family
, 38
(2)
, 309-309.
https://doi.org/10.2307/350390
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/350390