Abstract
People make three general types of judgments to express importance, preference, or likelihood and use them to choose the best among alternatives in the presence of environmental, social, political, and other influences. They base these judgments on knowledge in memory or from analyzing benefits, costs, and risks. From past knowledge, we sometimes can develop standards of excellence and poorness and use them to rate the alternatives one at a time. This is useful in such repetitive situations as student admissions and salary raises that must conform with established norms. Without norms one compares alternatives instead of rating them. Comparisons must fall in an admissible range of consistency. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) includes both the rating and comparison methods. Rationality requires developing a reliable hierarchic structure or feedback network that includes criteria of various types of influence, stakeholders, and decision alternatives to determine the best choice.
Keywords
Analytic hierarchy processConsistency (knowledge bases)SalaryPreferenceRationalityAnalytic network processComputer scienceProcess (computing)HierarchyExcellenceManagement scienceRisk analysis (engineering)Knowledge managementOperations researchEconomicsArtificial intelligenceBusinessEngineeringMicroeconomics
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process
Decisions involve many intangibles that need to be traded off. To do that, they have to be measured along side tangibles whose measurements must also be evaluated as to, how wel...
Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition
Cognition in organizations is a distributed phenomenon, in which individual members of an organization reflect upon their experience, make plans, or take action. Organizational ...
Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO Consultation
The classification of diabetes mellitus and the tests used for its diagnosis were brought into order by the National Diabetes Data Group of the USA and the second World Health O...
A Tool for Reviewers
Peer review lies at the core of science and academic life. In one of its most pervasive forms, peer review for the scientific literature is the main mechanism that research jour...
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
On a shelf in the sunny, open‐plan office of Cochrane Australia in Melbourne, there's a large, white ring‐binder that, it's fair to say, hasn't been opened in a while. It's a pr...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1994
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 19-43
- Citations
- 2110
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
2110
OpenAlex
Cite This
Thomas L. Saaty
(1994).
How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process.
INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics
, 24
(6)
, 19-43.
https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.24.6.19
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1287/inte.24.6.19