Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to provide an overview of the use and assessment of qualitative research methods in the health sciences. Qualitative research can be defined as the study of the nature of phenomena and is especially appropriate for answering questions of why something is (not) observed, assessing complex multi-component interventions, and focussing on intervention improvement. The most common methods of data collection are document study, (non-) participant observations, semi-structured interviews and focus groups. For data analysis, field-notes and audio-recordings are transcribed into protocols and transcripts, and coded using qualitative data management software. Criteria such as checklists, reflexivity, sampling strategies, piloting, co-coding, member-checking and stakeholder involvement can be used to enhance and assess the quality of the research conducted. Using qualitative in addition to quantitative designs will equip us with better tools to address a greater range of research problems, and to fill in blind spots in current neurological research and practice.

Keywords

Qualitative researchData collectionCoding (social sciences)ReflexivityComputer scienceQualitative propertyPsychological interventionFocus groupData scienceQuality (philosophy)Research designMultimethodologyManagement sciencePsychologySociologyMathematics educationEngineering

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies

PART ONE: PREPARING THE WAY: LAYING THE FOUNDATIONS FOR ANALYSIS Foundations for Thinking and Working Qualitatively Thinking Qualitatively Thinking Methods (and methodology) Wor...

2020 Medical Entomology and Zoology 1387 citations

Publication Info

Year
2020
Type
review
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
14-14
Citations
1184
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1184
OpenAlex

Cite This

Loraine Busetto, Wolfgang Wick, Christoph Gumbinger (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice , 2 (1) , 14-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z

Identifiers

DOI
10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z