Abstract

Abstract The typical functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) study presents a formidable problem of multiple statistical comparisons (i.e, > 10,000 in a 128 x 128 image). To protect against false positives, investigators have typically relied on decreasing the per pixel false positive probability. This approach incurs an inevitable loss of power to detect statistically significant activity. An alternative approach, which relies on the assumption that areas of true neural activity will tend to stimulate signal changes over contiguous pixels, is presented. If one knows the probability distribution of such cluster sizes as a function of per pixel false positive probability, one can use cluster‐size thresholds independently to reject false positives. Both Monte Carlo simulations and fMRI studies of human subjects have been used to verify that this approach can improve statistical power by as much as fivefold over techniques that rely solely on adjusting per pixel false positive probabilities.

Keywords

False positive paradoxFunctional magnetic resonance imagingPixelStatistical powerFalse positives and false negativesPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceMonte Carlo methodCluster (spacecraft)Multiple comparisons problemMagnetic resonance imagingStatistical hypothesis testingStatisticsMathematicsPsychologyMedicineNeuroscience

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1995
Type
article
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
636-647
Citations
3217
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3217
OpenAlex

Cite This

Steven D. Forman, Jonathan D. Cohen, Mark Fitzgerald et al. (1995). Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , 33 (5) , 636-647. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910330508

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/mrm.1910330508