Abstract

Case reports and case series have their own role in the progress of medical science. They permit discovery of new diseases and unexpected effects (adverse or beneficial) as well as the study of mechanisms, and they play an important role in medical education. Case reports and series have a high sensitivity for detecting novelty and therefore remain one of the cornerstones of medical progress; they provide many new ideas in medicine. At the same time, good case reporting demands a clear focus to make explicit to the audience why a particular observation is important in the context of existing knowledge.

Keywords

NoveltyMedicineContext (archaeology)Focus (optics)Data scienceEngineering ethicsComputer sciencePsychologySocial psychology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2001
Type
article
Volume
134
Issue
4
Pages
330-334
Citations
536
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

536
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jan P. Vandenbroucke (2001). In Defense of Case Reports and Case Series. Annals of Internal Medicine , 134 (4) , 330-334. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-4-200102200-00017

Identifiers

DOI
10.7326/0003-4819-134-4-200102200-00017