Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate the processing strategies consumers use to form inferences about missing product information. We evaluate the relative effect of attribute information about a partially described brand and about other fully described brands, the effect of attribute intercorrelations, and the effect of prompting inferences. We find that attribute information about a partially described brand has a greater influence than that about fully described competitive brands, that highly correlated attributes more consistently influence inferences, and that prompting inferences produces substantially different results than less intrusive measures.

Keywords

Product (mathematics)InferenceInformation processingPsychologyAdvertisingMarketingEconometricsCognitive psychologyComputer scienceBusinessMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
363-363
Citations
132
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

132
OpenAlex

Cite This

Gary T. Ford, Ruth Ann Smith (1987). Inferential Beliefs in Consumer Evaluations: An Assessment of Alternative Processing Strategies. Journal of Consumer Research , 14 (3) , 363-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/209119

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/209119