Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease

2020 New England Journal of Medicine 2,210 citations

Abstract

Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death from any cause over a median of 3.2 years. The trial findings were sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction that was used. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ISCHEMIA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01471522.).

Keywords

MedicineMedical therapyCoronary diseaseDiseaseCardiologyIntensive care medicineIntervention (counseling)Internal medicineCoronary heart disease

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2020
Type
article
Volume
382
Issue
15
Pages
1395-1407
Citations
2210
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2210
OpenAlex

Cite This

David J. Maron, Judith S. Hochman, Harmony R. Reynolds et al. (2020). Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. New England Journal of Medicine , 382 (15) , 1395-1407. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1915922

Identifiers

DOI
10.1056/nejmoa1915922