Abstract

This experiment investigated the causal links between injustice and interpersonal conflict. Previous research has suggested two possible explanations. One group of theorists has argued for a pragmatic model, whereby individuals engage in interpersonal conflict in order to maximize personal gain. Justice is, at most, a secondary consideration. Alternatively, others have suggested that perceived unfairness is a crucial element in conflict. The present study tested these two frameworks. As predicted, results were generally consistent with the justice model. However, the expression of conflict only took place when there was no opportunity for power restoration. Results are discussed in terms of the situation's impact on conflict behavior. Limitations of the present research design are noted.

Keywords

InjusticeInterpersonal communicationSocial psychologyPsychologyOrganizational justiceEconomic JusticePower (physics)Organizational conflictElement (criminal law)Interactional justiceConflict managementPolitical scienceOrganizational commitmentLaw

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

School And Society

In the revised and expanded second edition of Schools and Society, authors Walter Feinberg and Jonas F. Soltis invite teachers and administrators to develop their ability to que...

1985 Medical Entomology and Zoology 393 citations

Publication Info

Year
1991
Type
article
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
5-26
Citations
55
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

55
OpenAlex

Cite This

Russell Cropanzano, Robert A. Baron (1991). INJUSTICE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF POWER RESTORATION. International Journal of Conflict Management , 2 (1) , 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022691

Identifiers

DOI
10.1108/eb022691