Abstract

AS both the number and cost of clinical laboratory tests continue to increase at an accelerating rate,1 physicians are faced with the task of comprehending and acting on a rising flood tide of information. We conducted a small survey to obtain some idea of how physicians do, in fact, interpret a laboratory result.MethodsWe asked 20 house officers, 20 fourth-year medical students and 20 attending physicians, selected in 67 consecutive hallway encounters at four Harvard Medical School teaching hospitals, the following question: "If a test to detect a disease whose prevalence is 1/1000 has a false positive rate of . . .

Keywords

MedicineInterpretation (philosophy)MEDLINEMedical physicsIntensive care medicine

Related Publications

The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association

These recommendations are based on the following: (1) a formal review and analysis of the recently published world literature on the topic [Medline search up to June 2011]; (2) ...

2012 Hepatology 3765 citations

Participatory medicine

A recent study of ours1 showed that patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who were meditating, guided by meditation tapes, while they were undergoing UVB or PUVA treatments...

2000 Journal of the European Academy of De... 39 citations

Publication Info

Year
1978
Type
article
Volume
299
Issue
18
Pages
999-1001
Citations
739
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

739
OpenAlex

Cite This

Ward Casscells, Arno Schoenberger, Thomas B. Graboys (1978). Interpretation by Physicians of Clinical Laboratory Results. New England Journal of Medicine , 299 (18) , 999-1001. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197811022991808

Identifiers

DOI
10.1056/nejm197811022991808