Abstract

The Diagnostic Interview Schedule, the chief instrument in contemporary studies in psychiatric epidemiology, enhances the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis and enables lay interviewers to closely reproduce psychiatric interviews. However, despite frequent references in the literature to the validity of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, most studies fundamentally represent variations of reliability paradigms to the neglect of criterion-related validity. Mistaken assertions of validity persist in the psychometric language used to describe the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. This article examines the basis for claims and counterclaims of validity in accordance with standard psychometric definition, and identifies sources of erroneous reasoning in attempts to infer validity from reliability. The article presents a general framework organizing the process of diagnostic validation and discusses strategies for research seeking to validate psychiatric diagnoses achieved through the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

Keywords

PsychologyNeglectScheduleMedical diagnosisReliability (semiconductor)Test validityValidityCriterion validityPsychometricsPsychiatric epidemiologyPsychiatryClinical psychologyConstruct validityMedicineComputer scienceMental health

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1992
Type
review
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
59-67
Citations
86
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

86
OpenAlex

Cite This

Robert G. Malgady, Lloyd H. Rogler, Warren W. Tryon (1992). Issues of validity in the diagnostic interview schedule. Journal of Psychiatric Research , 26 (1) , 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(92)90016-h

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/0022-3956(92)90016-h