Abstract

In 6 experiments, the authors used a speeded question-answering task and a recognition task to examine how people know what they don't know. Extending work by S. Glucksberg and M. McCloskey (1981) to examine metamemory judgments about narratives, the authors asked participants to respond to 2 types of "don't know" questions. In certain conditions, readers were faster to respond "don't know" to implicit "don't know" questions (i.e., no information regarding the answers was provided) than to explicit "don't know" questions (i.e., narratives explicitly stated that something was unknown). The speed of responding to the implicit "don't know" questions was related to the familiarity of the question, which is consistent with claims that fast metacognitive judgments are based on a preliminary evaluation of the familiarity of a cue. This is a first step in integrating theories of metacognition and discourse processing.

Keywords

MetamemoryMetacognitionPsychologyTask (project management)NarrativeNeed to knowCognitive psychologyLevels-of-processing effectSocial psychologyCognitionLinguistics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Learning question classifiers

In order to respond correctly to a free form factual question given a large collection of texts, one needs to understand the question to a level that allows determining some of ...

2002 1260 citations

Publication Info

Year
1997
Type
article
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
1378-1393
Citations
34
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

34
OpenAlex

Cite This

Celia M. Klin, Alexandria E. Guzmán, William H. Levine (1997). Knowing that you don't know: Metamemory and discourse processing.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition , 23 (6) , 1378-1393. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.23.6.1378

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037//0278-7393.23.6.1378