Abstract
This paper analyzes the incentives of large shareholders to monitor public corporations. We investigate the hypothesis that a liquid stock market reduces large shareholders' incentives to monitor because it allows them to sell their stocks more easily. Even though this is true, a liquid market also makes it less costly to hold larger stakes and easier to purchase additional shares. We show that this fact is important if monitoring is costly: market liquidity mitigates the problem that small shareholders free ride on the effort of the large shareholder. We find that liquid stock markets are beneficial because they make corporate governance more effective.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The Choice of Stock Ownership Structure: Agency Costs, Monitoring, and the Decision to Go Public
From the viewpoint of a company's controlling shareholder, the optimal ownership structure generally involves some measure of dispersion, to avoid excessive monitoring by other ...
Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation
It is commonly thought that a widely held corporation that is not being run in the interest of its shareholders will be vulnerable to a takeover bid. We show that this is false,...
Executive Motivations, Earnings, and Consequent Equity Performance
In this paper the financial incentives of executives are analyzed, theoretically and econometrically, with particular emphasis on the relationship between executive motivations ...
Liquidity and the 1987 stock market crash
T he Crash of October 1987 was a puzzling event puzzling not only for what happened on October 19, but also for what subsequently did not happen. In spite of the magnitude and m...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1998
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-98
- Citations
- 1482
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/0022-1082.35053