Abstract
Fake news sharing in 2016 was rare but significantly more common among older Americans.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
Finding facts about fake news There was a proliferation of fake news during the 2016 election cycle. Grinberg et al. analyzed Twitter data by matching Twitter accounts to specif...
Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention
Across two studies with more than 1,700 U.S. adults recruited online, we present evidence that people share false claims about COVID-19 partly because they simply fail to think ...
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Following the 2016 US presidential election, many have expressed concern about the effects of false stories (“fake news”), circulated largely through social media. We discuss th...
Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.
The 2016 U.S. presidential election brought considerable attention to the phenomenon of "fake news": entirely fabricated and often partisan content that is presented as factual....
Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media
Contemporary commentators describe the current period as "an era of fake news" in which misinformation, generated intentionally or unintentionally, spreads rapidly. Although aff...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2019
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- eaau4586-eaau4586
- Citations
- 1527
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
- PMID
- 30662946
- PMCID
- PMC6326755