Abstract
Social movements seeking to change the subordinate status of ethnic minorities have drawn activists from both the minority and dominant groups. Conflict has at times developed between movement members of these two groups. In a comparative analysis of three movements—the civil rights movement, the anti‐slavery cause in the U.S., and the movement to abolish Untouchability in India—the sources of tension appear quite similar. Ideologically, minority group activists viewed themselves as more radical and committed to that particular cause than did their dominant group co‐workers and were more for a strategy of minority group self‐help. Organizational conflict arose as majority members disproportionately assumed decision‐making positions in the movement. A third source of tension developed because some movement members were carriers of prejudices and hostilities of the larger social milieu. Outsiders frequently played essential roles in the early phases of these movements, but pressures developed on majority members to reduce involvement or withdraw altogether.
Keywords
Social movementCivil rightsPolitical scienceMovement (music)Ethnic groupIdeologyMinority groupGender studiesCriminologyLawPolitical economySociologySocial psychologyPsychologyPolitics
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Master Framing and Cross-Movement Networking in Contemporary Social Movements
AbstractThis article maps the network of cross-movement activism in Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, and explores the relationship between position in the network and cognit...
Production and extrapolation of meaning in the environmental justice movement
We analyze the structural determinants of social construction processes in the environmental justice movement. We argue that initial structural conditions legitimated environmen...
Between Old and New: Social Movements and Cultural Change
Social movement actors often challenge authorities on behalf of people whose needs and interests are not addressed. To do this, they must accomplish a contradictory task. They m...
Protest as a Political Resource
The frequent resort to protest activity by relatively powerless groups in recent American politics suggests that protest represents an important aspect of minority group and low...
Dramaturgy and Social Movements: The Social Construction and Communication of Power*
This paper seeks to illuminate how social movements collectively construct and communicate power. Drawing on insights from dramaturgy as well as from field research of several m...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1971
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-104
- Citations
- 54
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
54
OpenAlex
Cite This
Gary T. Marx,
Michael Useem
(1971).
Majority Involvement in Minority Movements: Civil Rights, Abolition, Untouchability<sup>1</sup>.
Journal of Social Issues
, 27
(1)
, 81-104.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1971.tb00637.x
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1971.tb00637.x