Abstract

A number of insect species and red deer possess two forms of males differing from each other in the extent of development of devices involved in competition for females. Such forms may represent genetically based alternative strategies, one form being inferior in combat but wasting little energy in developing expensive weaponry, the other form being superior in combat but burdened with great energy expenditure to achieve this superiority. The return on investment in weaponry for the latter form depends not on the absolute value of investment, but on the extent of investment relative to the other forms present in the population. Such coevolution leads to an escalation of investment in devices of male competition. This costly arms race comes to an end when those investing in weaponry are just as well off as those which have totally opted out of such investment. Such a mechanism could precisely equalize the selective advantages of the two alternatives. Such coevolution is therefore a possible mechanism for the maintenance of a genetic polymorphism.

Keywords

Investment (military)BiologyCoevolutionCompetition (biology)Mechanism (biology)Arms raceSexual selectionPopulationSexual dimorphismDirectional selectionNatural selectionEconomicsEvolutionary biologyEcologyZoologyDemography

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1972
Type
article
Volume
106
Issue
951
Pages
574-580
Citations
228
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

228
OpenAlex

Cite This

Madhav Gadgil (1972). Male Dimorphism as a Consequence of Sexual Selection. The American Naturalist , 106 (951) , 574-580. https://doi.org/10.1086/282797

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/282797