Abstract

In ecology, populations may be linked conceptually with landscapes through habitat and spatial population models. Usually, these models deal with single species and treat a range of uncertainties implicitly and explicitly. They assist managers in testing different management scenarios and making strategic decisions. Landscape pattern analysis was the first attempt to deal with multiple species, and it led to a range of landscape management strategies. Advances in landscape ecology, driven largely by the pragmatic needs of conservation, are building approaches to multispecies management that have stronger ecological foundations. However, their treatment of uncertainty is in its infancy. In this paper, we provide examples to illustrate some of these issues. We conclude that one of the most important sources of uncertainty is the choice of the modeling frame. We recommend that landscape planners use different kinds of models, identify important sources of uncertainty that may affect planning decisions, and seek options that are likely to result in tolerable outcomes, despite uncertainty.

Keywords

Environmental resource managementEcologyRange (aeronautics)Frame (networking)PopulationHabitatGeographyComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringBiologySociology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION

1. Fishes have definite habitat preferences which cause them to be definitely arranged in streams which have a graded series of conditions from mouth to source. 2. Beginning at ...

1911 Biological Bulletin 137 citations

Publication Info

Year
2005
Type
article
Volume
86
Issue
8
Pages
2007-2017
Citations
195
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

195
OpenAlex

Cite This

Mark A. Burgman, David B. Lindenmayer, Jane Elith (2005). MANAGING LANDSCAPES FOR CONSERVATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY. Ecology , 86 (8) , 2007-2017. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0906

Identifiers

DOI
10.1890/04-0906