Abstract

Abstract Imaging of photochemical yield of photosystem II (PSII) computed from leaf chlorophyll fluorescence images and gas-exchange measurements were performed on Rosa rubiginosa leaflets during abscisic acid (ABA) addition. In air ABA induced a decrease of both the net CO2 assimilation (An) and the stomatal water vapor conductance (gs). After ABA treatment, imaging in transient nonphotorespiratory conditions (0.1% O2) revealed a heterogeneous decrease of PSII photochemical yield. This decline was fully reversed by a transient high CO2 concentration (7400 μmol mol−1) in the leaf atmosphere. It was concluded that ABA primarily affected An by decreasing the CO2 supply at ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Therefore, the An versus intercellular mole fraction (Ci) relationship was assumed not to be affected by ABA, and images ofCi and gs were constructed from images of PSII photochemical yield under nonphotorespiratory conditions. The distribution ofgs remained unimodal following ABA treatment. A comparison of calculations of Ci from images and gas exchange in ABA-treated leaves showed that the overestimation of Ci estimated from gas exchange was only partly due to heterogeneity. This overestimation was also attributed to the cuticular transpiration, which largely affects the calculation of the leaf conductance to CO2, when leaf conductance to water is low.

Keywords

Abscisic acidTranspirationStomatal conductanceMole fractionPhotosynthesisChemistryChlorophyll fluorescencePhotosystem IIChlorophyll aRuBisCOMoleBotanyChlorophyllConductanceYield (engineering)HorticultureBiologyMaterials scienceBiochemistry

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1998
Type
article
Volume
116
Issue
3
Pages
947-957
Citations
109
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

109
OpenAlex

Cite This

Sylvie Meyer, Bernard Genty (1998). Mapping Intercellular CO2 Mole Fraction (<i>C</i>i) in<i>Rosa rubiginosa</i>Leaves Fed with Abscisic Acid by Using Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging1. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY , 116 (3) , 947-957. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.116.3.947

Identifiers

DOI
10.1104/pp.116.3.947