Abstract

An implicit association test (IAT) measures differential association of 2 target concepts with an attribute. The 2 concepts appear in a 2-choice task (2-choice task (e.g., flower vs. insect names), and the attribute in a 2nd task (e.g., pleasant vs. unpleasant words for an evaluation attribute). When instructions oblige highly associated categories (e.g., flower + pleasant) to share a response key, performance is faster than when less associated categories (e.g., insect & pleasant) share a key. This performance difference implicitly measures differential association of the 2 concepts with the attribute. In 3 experiments, the IAT was sensitive to (a) near-universal evaluative differences (e.g., flower vs. insect), (b) expected individual differences in evaluative associations (Japanese + pleasant vs. Korean + pleasant for Japanese vs. Korean subjects), and (c) consciously disavowed evaluative differences (Black + pleasant vs. White + pleasant for self-described unprejudiced White subjects).

Keywords

Implicit-association testPsychologyAssociation (psychology)Task (project management)CognitionSocial psychologyImplicit attitudeCognitive psychologyTest (biology)Differential (mechanical device)Developmental psychology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1998
Type
article
Volume
74
Issue
6
Pages
1464-1480
Citations
8355
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

8355
OpenAlex

Cite This

Anthony G. Greenwald, Debbie E. McGhee, Jordan L. K. Schwartz (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 74 (6) , 1464-1480. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464