Abstract
Cases of clear scientific misconduct have received significant media attention recently, but less flagrantly questionable research practices may be more prevalent and, ultimately, more damaging to the academic enterprise. Using an anonymous elicitation format supplemented by incentives for honest reporting, we surveyed over 2,000 psychologists about their involvement in questionable research practices. The impact of truth-telling incentives on self-admissions of questionable research practices was positive, and this impact was greater for practices that respondents judged to be less defensible. Combining three different estimation methods, we found that the percentage of respondents who have engaged in questionable practices was surprisingly high. This finding suggests that some questionable practices may constitute the prevailing research norm.
Keywords
IncentiveMisconductPsychologyNorm (philosophy)Scientific misconductSocial psychologyBest practicePublic relationsLawPolitical scienceAlternative medicineMedicine
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The effects of bonus schemes on accounting decisions
Studies examining managerial accounting decisions postulate that executives rewarded by earnings-based bonuses select accounting procedures that increase their compensation. The...
The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem.
The relationship of agency is one of the oldest and commonest codified modes of social interaction. We will say that an agency relationship has arisen between two (or more) part...
The Optimal Structure of Incentives and Authority within an Organization
Two kinds of models for a productive organization are presented. In the first, both production and rewards are based on the performance of individuals, which is perfectly observ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2012
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 524-532
- Citations
- 2266
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
2266
OpenAlex
Cite This
Leslie K. John,
George Loewenstein,
Dražen Prelec
(2012).
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling.
Psychological Science
, 23
(5)
, 524-532.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/0956797611430953