Abstract

The majority of meta-analyses on orthopaedic-surgery-related topics have methodological limitations. Limitation of bias and improvement in the validity of the meta-analyses can be achieved by adherence to strict scientific methodology. However, the ultimate quality of a meta-analysis depends on the quality of the primary studies on which it is based. A meta-analysis is most persuasive when data from high-quality randomized trials are pooled.

Keywords

Meta-analysisMedicineOrthopedic surgeryMEDLINEPhysical therapySystematic reviewSurgeryInternal medicine

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2001
Type
review
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
15-24
Citations
185
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

185
OpenAlex

Cite This

Mohit Bhandari, Farrah Morrow, Abhaya V. Kulkarni et al. (2001). Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery , 83 (1) , 15-24. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200101000-00003

Identifiers

DOI
10.2106/00004623-200101000-00003