Abstract
The use of individual participant data instead of aggregate data in meta-analyses has many potential advantages, both statistically and clinically. <b>Richard D Riley and colleagues</b> describe the rationale for an individual participant data meta-analysis and outline how to conduct this type of study
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
Abstract Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to impr...
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the r...
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and tr...
Evaluating Meta-analyses in the General Surgical Literature
This critical appraisal of meta-analyses published in the general surgery literature demonstrates frequent methodologic flaws. The quality of these reports limits the validity o...
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarise evidence relating to efficacy and safety of healthcare interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and tra...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2010
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 340
- Issue
- feb05 1
- Pages
- c221-c221
- Citations
- 1623
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.c221