Abstract

The meta-analysis of randomized trials indicated a significant survival benefit when GEM was either combined with platinum analogs or fluoropyrimidines. Based on a preliminary subgroup analysis (representing 38% of all patients included in this meta-analysis), pancreatic cancer patients with a good PS appear to benefit from GEM-based cytotoxic combinations, whereas patients with a poor PS seem to have no survival benefit from combination chemotherapy.

Keywords

MedicineGemcitabineInternal medicinePemetrexedIrinotecanHazard ratioOncologyRandomized controlled trialPancreatic cancerChemotherapyMeta-analysisCombination chemotherapySurgical oncologyCancerSurgeryConfidence intervalCisplatinColorectal cancer

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Bayesian network meta-comparison of maintenance treatments for stage IIIb/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with good performance status not progressing after first-line induction chemotherapy: Results by performance status, EGFR mutation, histology and response to previous induction

Maintenance treatments show clinically meaningful survival benefits in good performance status patients with advanced NSCLC not progressing after first-line chemotherapy. Benefi...

2015 European Journal of Cancer 17 citations

Publication Info

Year
2008
Type
review
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
82-82
Citations
425
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

425
OpenAlex

Cite This

Volker Heinemann, Stefan Boeck, Axel Hinke et al. (2008). Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer. BMC Cancer , 8 (1) , 82-82. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-82

Identifiers

DOI
10.1186/1471-2407-8-82