Abstract

Procedures for analyzing multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices are reviewed. Confirmatory factor analysis (Jöreskog, 1974) is presented as a general model allowing evaluation of the discriminant and convergent validity of MTMM matrices, both as a whole and in individual trait-method units. However, it is noted that this model is deficient with regard to analysis of trait-method interactions of the type de scribed by Campbell and O'Connell (1967, 1982). Composite direct product models described by Browne (1984) are one possible solution to this problem. Fur ther, more systematic use of hypothesis testing regard ing convergent and discriminant validity in nested hi erarchical models is recommended (Widaman, 1985), as well as the use of a procedure to cross-validate models of MTMM matrices described by Cudeck and Browne (1983).

Keywords

Confirmatory factor analysisDiscriminant validityLinear discriminant analysisTraitStatisticsMathematicsConvergent validityPsychologyEconometricsPsychometricsComputer scienceStructural equation modeling

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1986
Type
article
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-22
Citations
314
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

314
OpenAlex
12
Influential
215
CrossRef

Cite This

Neal Schmitt, Daniel M. Stults (1986). Methodology Review: Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement , 10 (1) , 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168601000101

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/014662168601000101

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%