Minimizing GCV/GML Scores with Multiple Smoothing Parameters via the Newton Method

1991 SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 184 citations

Abstract

The (modified) Newton method is adapted to optimize generalized cross validation (GCV) and generalized maximum likelihood (GML) scores with multiple smoothing parameters. The main concerns in solving the optimization problem are the speed and the reliability of the algorithm, as well as the invariance of the algorithm under transformations under which the problem itself is invariant. The proposed algorithm is believed to be highly efficient for the problem, though it is still rather expensive for large data sets, since its operational counts are $(2/3)kn^3 + O(n^2 )$, with k the number of smoothing parameters and n the number of observations. Sensible procedures for computing good starting values are also proposed, which should help in keeping the execution load to the minimum possible. The algorithm is implemented in Rkpack [RKPACK and its applications: Fitting smoothing spline models, Tech. Report 857, Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 1989] and illustrated by examples of fitting additive and interaction spline models. It is noted that the algorithm can also be applied to the maximum likelihood (ML) and the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation of the variance component models.

Keywords

SmoothingRestricted maximum likelihoodMathematicsAlgorithmNewton's methodMaximum likelihoodMathematical optimizationSmoothing splineReliability (semiconductor)Spline (mechanical)Invariant (physics)StatisticsComputer scienceEstimation theoryApplied mathematics

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1991
Type
article
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
383-398
Citations
184
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

184
OpenAlex
19
Influential
112
CrossRef

Cite This

Chong Gu, Grace Wahba (1991). Minimizing GCV/GML Scores with Multiple Smoothing Parameters via the Newton Method. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing , 12 (2) , 383-398. https://doi.org/10.1137/0912021

Identifiers

DOI
10.1137/0912021

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%